Thursday, April 26, 2012

Parental Influecne on Education.... Rough Draft


Alex Kuck

4/25/12

English 3029

Dr. Chandler

Final Paper



                                                Parental Influence on Education



Parents and even caregivers are the most influential part of a child’s life.  One of the other most important aspects of a child’s life is education.  It is important to express to a   child an education is one of the most important parts of life.  Being a mother myself I have the desire to express to my son that when you have an education you have the whole world at your hands.  In my daily life and throughout my many years of caring for children I have had numerous opportunities to observe how parents influence specifically a child’s literacy education.  There are many different ways to work with a child when it comes to academic aspects.  The focus of my paper will centralize on what role the parents play when it comes to literacy education.   I wanted to specifically see what influence that parents have on children, how much they are involved and practices that their parents did with them when they were younger, and how these practices influence how they address education with their children.



For my paper I decided to interview two women.  One of my subjects was Dr. Sally Chandler, mother of 4 grown children, who is an English professor at Kean University in Union, New Jersey.  My second subject was Lorraine Savoy, mother of 2 school age children, who is an honors English teacher at Scotch Plains Fanwood High School in Scotch Plains, New Jersey. I found both of the interviews that I conducted to be interesting because while both of the women were English teachers they both had different insights to offer as their children were of different ages.



As follows is my transcript for both of my subjects. 



Transcript #1- Mrs. Lorraine Savoy



Alex:  I am going to start with background information.  What is your name?



Lorraine: Lorraine Savoy



A: Where do you live?



L:  720 Warfield Road, North Plainfield, New Jersey



A:  Where do you work?



L:  Scotch Plains Fanwood High School



A: What is your position in the school?



L: I am an 11th grade honors English teacher



A: Can you describe to me your family structure? As far as how many kids you have and what their ages are?



L:  We have two children. Meg is 9 years old, and Catherine is 6 years old.



A:  What is your level of education?



L:  College degree, Bachelors of Arts, not yet my masters





Parent’s preschool experience:



A:  Now we are going to talk about your experiences before formal education.    What was your earliest experience with reading?



L:  I never remember not knowing how to read.  I always just knew. The story in my family is that my sister who is two years older than me would come home from school, and I would sit down next to her while she worked on school work and reading and I would try to read what she was reading after she was done.  There is another story in my family is when we would go on outings when I was young, that I would try to read different billboards and I would memorize them.  Since I was so young no one really believed that I could read them the way that I did.  I also remember at the end of Kindergarten when the school year was almost done that I was allowed to go into one of the first grade classrooms and take books off the shelf and read them because I had successfully finished all the books in the two Kindergarten classrooms.   I felt so special, I felt like the world smiled on me. 



A:  Wow, that’s amazing…  Ok, did your parents read to you when you were growing up? Mom? Dad? Other?



L:  I actually have no memory of them reading to me specifically because I started when I was so young.  We definitely had books all over the house, and we would take weekly trips to the library.  Oh one thing that I remember clearly was that we had a book mobile that would come through town.  IT WAS AMAZINGG!!  It came to the street that I lived on and it was so cool to walk onto a bus that was completely filled with books!  It was a book  borrowing system and it was really neat!  It was like the ice cream man! It was a teeny tiny space but I loved it because it was completely filled with books!  So all of my memories of reading revolved around me reading to myself, and for myself because it was something that I really enjoyed!



A:  Great!  So did you have a favorite story or book growing up? 

L:  Yes, I loved the Boxcar Children series, the Bobbsey Twins series, and the All of a Kind Family series.  I liked stories and books that had lots of children in them, I thought that they were very cool. 



A:  Did you learn nursery rhymes growing up?



L:  Oh yes!   The Rolly Polly Puppy.  That one was my absolute favorite!  I loved all of the nursery rhymes, I loved to sing them.  That’s what me and my sister would do,  we would sing them.  Not just the words, but the songs as well.



A:  Did you memorize or read along to your favorite books?



L:  Yes, most memorably The Rolly Polly Puppy!  I also clearly remember memorizing The Monster at The end of this book.  Which is also a book that I love reading to my kids to this day!  Now that I think about it both of those were ones that my sister and I must have read with my mom because I have a strong emotion attached to both of them.  The three little kittens that lost their mittens was another big one that we loved.  We even use to act that one out!



A:  Ok now  how about your T.V. habits?  What influence did T.V. have on you when you were growing up?



L:  We had a T.V., and now that I am thinking about it, it was smaller than the piece of paper you are writing on right now.  It was a black and white T.V. and we got it when I was 6.  We didn’t have a T.V. before then because we lived in the Philippines.  So the first time that I really watched T.V. was when we came back to the states.  When I was about 9 or 10 we got a bigger color T.V. which was amazing.  My sister and I always watched Saturday morning cartoons until our eyes fell out!  During the week we watched very little T.V., maybe a bit before bed, and then it was off to bed.  It was more restricted during the week!  We played a lot outside growing up!



A:  Did you attend preschool?



L:  I honestly don’t remember.  We lived in the Phiipines, so there may have been nursery school, it probably wasn’t full time though.  Like one or two morning a week but I really don’t remember.  I did go to Kindergarten though. 



Formal school experience:



A:  Ok, now I am going to talk with you about your more formal school experience.  Can you rate the priority of education when you were growing up?  As far, was it very important, somewhat important, or not important? 



L:  It was VERY important!  Not so much as bringing home grades, but if we didn’t do what we were suppose to do, If we didn’t show effort and work hard the world would crash and fall. 

A:  So you had the expectation then?  You knew what you had to do in the eyes of your parents?



L:  Oh yea!  Absolutely!



A:  Ok, were good grades rewarded in your home?  Were you ever pressured to get good grades?



L:  It wasn’t an option to not get good grades, so we weren’t rewarded because there was no need because we knew what we had to do!  We never got a physical reward, but we always got “oh that’s great”, “good job, keep up the good work!” which was good enough for me.  There was no if you do, if you don’t, we knew what we had to do.  There was no talking about rewards because it wasn’t necessary.  We didn’t get an award for breathing because it was something that we just did, so getting good grades was important, so we just did it! I also do remember that good grades or projects or whatever was hung on the refrigerator which was very important to me and was a good feeling as well! 



A:  Ok, how were your parents involved in your education growing up?  Did they help you with homework? To what extent?



L:  We didn’t really have homework back then, if we did it was very minimal.  In the early 70’s little kids didn’t come home with homework.  When I came home my mom would ask me how my day was, what did I do in school, did I learn anything new, those kinds of things.  She was genuinely interested.  When my dad came home from work he would do the same as well.  I do remember my mom coming into the school to be a classroom mom, reading to the class and spending time and volunteering in the school.  She always came to school and saw all the different things that I had hanging in the halls, those types of things.  We just didn’t have homework.  That was more of a grown up thing.  It was more something that you did when you got older.   My parents were always involved.



A:  Ok, you said earlier that you always just kind of knew how to read.  So your parents didn’t really read to then?



L:  Not regularly.  I mean there were certain stories that we would gather around and read together.  There were a few that we would always read as a family. Not every day, and not before bedtime or anything like that.  My sister and I were always just kind of reading on our own. 



A: Did you own books growing up?  Have them in the house?



L:  I clearly remember getting my first book shelf, which was my own piece of furniture.  To this day it in still in my room at my parents’ house.  I felt so special to have that.  And boy did I fill that sucker up!  When the book flyer would come home from school, I would just pick out as many as I could to buy.  There was never any mention that we couldn’t afford books.  There were some ways that I felt we couldn’t afford but books were never one of them.  And we went to the library every week so there were always lots of books around me growing up!



A: Ok so you did mention that you had an older sister.  Did she influence how you read growing up?



L:  Yes, my sister was two years older than me, so she would come home from school, and practice with me.  It made me feel very grown up. 



A: Ok, so now what I am going to do is go back and apply the same questions that I just asked you to your own children and how you influence their literacy education.



Children’s preschool experience



A:  What can you remember as your childs’ earliest experience with reading. 



L:  I read with them before they even knew what reading was really.  I would listen to books on tape when I nursed and stuff like that.  I read all of the time when I was with them, so it was something that I just saw.  So that made it an easy transition to giving them a picture book and having them read it.  That was part of our cuddle time, our together time.  It was something that I enjoyed.  When they were very young infants I tried to engage them with my voice and tried to get them comfortable with me and books were a way to do that.  So basically I have read to them forever. 



A:  So with your children, who was it that primarily read to them?



L:  It was me, due to the fact that I am the major reader.



A: ok, would you say that reading is a part of their bedtime routine?



L:  It has now fallen out of the wayside now that they are older.  When they were little there was no questions asked that we would read every night.  They always begged for one more book!  Now that they are older they are more independent with the way that they read.  They read on their own more, even Catherine.  All three of us together are actually reading Little Women in small sections which they are enjoying to do.  We finished it a few nights ago and it was lovely!  That’s what I try to do, read a longer work like that.  Something that will be more sustained.  I still read to them to, and they love that.  I don’t do it as much as I use to but when I get it to do it, I cherish the moment!



A:  Do either one of them have a favorite book?



L:  I think that it changes quickly because they have so many books, but I do see Meg going back to the book that has the 50 childhood tales and she dips in and out of that.  There must be stories that she has read millions of times but she truly enjoys reading them!  I think that she likes the variety of them.  She really likes a whole range of books.  Catherine on the other hand, just wants to read whatever Meg reads.  There are certain books that she gravitates more too.  There are certain books she likes because she like the different voices that we would do and stuff like that. 



A:  Ok how about nursery rhymes?



L:  Yes we had a whole book that we would read, I would say ok you can each pick three, and they would say no mommy no, 5!  And we would read them, and memorize them, I came across some that I didn’t even know existed!  I loved the patterns and the rhymes, there were so many fun ones! 



A:  Ok can you tell me about their T.V. habits?



L:  It’s really more then I like them to watch and I try to limit them to an hour week nights. If they get up early in the morning they are allowed to watch T.V. which I don’t agree with but I do it because I am trying to get ready and get out the door.  And on Saturdays they watch T.V. until their eyeballs fall out which I can’t really argue with because I use to do the same thing!  I will say that they are playing more wii now which is better I guess because there is at least some activity involved!



A:  Ok, did they go to preschool?



L:  Yes, they both went to a very good preschool, the same one.  And yes they were both reading at least a limited level before they entered preschool.



A: Ok, now we are going to talk about their formal school experience.  How do you rate the priority and value of education with your children?  Very important, somewhat important, or not important at all?



L:  I rate it as very important simply because it provides them with every opportunity.  I want them to have choices, and I think that education equals choices.  I don’t so much care about an individual grade, if they are really working, if they are trying, if they are doing what they can do, and I also want them to learn how to handle hard things, big things, things they have to persist in, like what their strengths  are build on them, and what their weaknesses are and work around them.  It’s an ongoing process, and I think that education in its own right is important and I also think that lessons about learning, about tackling certain issues is important too.  It is also a good way to teach life lessons as well.  School gives them something new to think about every day, keeps their brain ripe!



A: Do you reward good grades? 



L: I actually just decided to do something about that.  A friend of mine told me that whenever she did well in school, like when they got outstanding or satisfactory, they got books as rewards.  Outstanding was 3 books that they could pick out, and a satisfactory was 1 book.  And I thought huh, I don’t want to pay for them to get good grades, but I know they love books.  So I figured that I would take them to the thrift store and pick out some books when they performed well in school.  Like 5 or 6 books or so, because I figure it’s a reward, not a bribe.  It’s connected, it’s organic, and it’s something that I know they would love, and something that they would know that I’m proud of them but not paying them to get good grades. 



A: Yea so you are promoting higher learning, not just saying here is 20 bucks, go buy something, and they could really buy anything with that, like candy, you eat it, it’s gone, while a book lasts forever!



L:  It just feels right and I’m excited by the whole thing!



A:  Are you involved in their school activities?



L:  As much as I can, being that I am a working mother.  I am able to pick them up every day after school which is great because I get to see their teachers.  I’m also on the PTA, and I do the school fairs, and basket auctions, support the school, send money in for everything, and when I can I take off for important events that they take part in. Catherine had a Thanksgiving play and it was only 12 minutes long but I did it because I knew it was important to her to have us both there.  And Meg got an award at an assembly one year and I went to that and I was just so proud of her.



A: my next question was if you still read to them. I now know that you do, you read together, but it’s harder now that they are older because they are independent readers.



A:  My next question would be then how much reading did the girls see you do, as they’ve been growing up?



L:  YES!  All the time consistently it was mommy put the book down, mommy put the book down, mommy put the book down and look at me, accompanied by me saying one second sweetie, ok what do you need?  They always know where my latest book is. Ill say go upstairs and get my book, and they’ll say oh is that the red one, or the green cover or whatever.  They know what I am reading, they have always been aware of that.  I like that a lot!



A: I’ve also noticed that when I sit down with them when I’m with them Monday nights for dinner they always want to read and have a book I their hand!  I get worried that they will get the book messy but I think that it’s great that they love to read at all times!



L:  My rule is that we don’t eat while we eat supper, but when it’s lunchtime, and dads not here, and it’s just us girls, we are going to read!  Mostly because I wanna read to!!



A:  Ok now this is a silly question, but, can you tell me about the books they own?



L:  They own a gazillion books and that is one of the caveots  of going to the thrift store, was that they have to make room, that they have to clear off some of their shelves, and they kind of feel good about it.  We have gone through, made room with the books that are two young for them.  They kind of say oh can I keep this one or that one? And I say ok yea hold on to that one for a little longer. 



A: Do the girls read to each other?



L: Yes being that they are such independent readers, they read to each other, back and forth.  When they were younger Meg would read to Catherine and I think that I one of the reasons that Catherine has developed into such a reader because she wants to impress and be like her older sister.  She thinks that reading is something that big people do, so I’m going to do it to!



A:  Do they do any kind of writing?



L:  Yes when Meg was 6 she asked for a diary.  Just the fact that it locked she loved!  I was actually amazed about how much writing they did in preschool.  I didn’t know that was how things went at the time.  They actually wrote before they could really read.  They both see themselves as writers both in school and out.  They love to write quite a bit, they love to write stories, and tales.  Funny story actually Catherine’s teacher showed me a piece that she had written and she ran out of room on the page so she wrote in the margins so it went in consistent circles around and around, I thought it was hysterical, wonderful.  They really do a lot of writing. 



A: how about when you were younger? Did you write?



L:  I must have done some, but nowhere near what they do now.  And I don’t remember writing for myself, until I was like 10 or 12 maybe.  They both have little things they write, they pick up journals write in them, and then not again for months, and go back to them, but I don’t remember doing that.  When I was 10 or 12 I did do some journal writing that mostly talked about my emotions like I’m so mad because of this or that, that kind of thing.  That’s something that I’ve come back to now as far as writing goes.  I wrote letters to them when I was pregnant, like my dear baby and stuff like that. 



A:  When you were growing up was reading more important than writing?  Or was it the same?



L:  For me personally reading was more important.  I also feel like reading was more stressed in my home then writing.  And in school as well. With the girls however they love both.  In the classroom there is more of an emphasis on writing, and they are becoming great writers.  I personally value the reading a lot more though.  The writing is great though and they do go through phases where they would rather read then write or vice versa.   It’s a great cycle.



A:  Ok the final thing that I would like to talk about is how do you feel your influences in general as a parent influence the way that your children perceive education?



L:  One of the reasons why I love reading and became so into it was because I moved around a lot as a child.  School was a place for me to excel.  Find where I was, and reading was a friend that I always had.  Reading for me was a way to stay off of loneliness.  It kept me sheltered, it was a very protected activity.  What I think is interesting is that my children are more interactive with their reading.  Both with each other and their friends.  They talk about books with each other, they share books, and experiences.  It’s just constant interaction.  I hope that because I am trying to give them a positive world and a joyful world that they are finding all these different experiences through writing.  I cant help it, I try to educate them all the time!


( I still have to finish up this transcript and type up yours because i decided that i wanted to type them myself so that I can be more familiar with the material!)  However even without tying up your interivew i am making several connections between parents and the influence they have on their children ans education no matter what age they are.  I am planning on drawing more connections bewteen the 2 transcripts and adding in my input.  While my paper will inlcude points from both interviews the transcritps in their entirety will not be included. I am picking out the points that best highlight what my my central foucs! Please let me know what you think if this!)



Thursday, April 19, 2012

Plan for research paper....

The methods that I am going to use are observation and interviews.  I am going to interview two different women: one who is an high school teacher mother of two children and one who is a stay at home mother of three.

What I am going to research through various data bases and my interviews is how women influence the way that literacy education is perceived in the home setting.

My opening paragraph could be as follows:
Throughout my years of caring for children I have had numerous opportunities to observe how parents influence the way literacy education is perceived in the home setting.



premise that what at home matters

head start

routines at home (reading at home)

attidtudes

skills and drills

what was important to them


Thursday, April 12, 2012

Adult Learners- Discourse Analysis


Alex Kuck
4/12/12
Eng 3029
Research in Language in Literature
Dr. Chandler
                                                Adult Learners - Discourse Analysis
Discourse analysis by definition relates to language in its entirety.  Discourse is the overall performance of language.   It relates to communication of thought by words, talk and conversation.  Its communication connected to culture and identity.  Discourse analysis is also the way that language is used to create meaning.  When language is broken into parts, patterns can then be identified.  After this occurs relationships between the parts can also begin to be examined.  Discourse is something that one doesn’t realize occurs around them constantly.  Simple everyday acts such as talking to family and friends involve conversation.  The focus of my paper will show how in the adult learner’s transcript the dynamics of the language used changed immensely over the course of the transcript.  My paper will reiterate the subjects’ feelings toward technology; specifically computers, and how it was never considered that they could be used for educational purposes.  The researcher in this transcript is able to change the entire conversation by having the subject become more comfortable with the researcher.  This is an essential move in this transcript because it changes the dynamics of the language and sets up the framework for the relationship between the interviewer and the subject. 
            The lens that I found to be most evident was language.  The word choices between the researcher and the subject were crucial.  The researcher started with a straight forward question and I could tell that the subject was not quite comfortable.  The subject responds to the question with a lot of hesitation.  An example of this is as follows I guess that I thought that I couldn’t do it, I didn’t trust myself, I didn’t trust the computer, I was afraid.   The level of uncertainty was evident from this point and there seemed to be a slight awkwardness. The subject continued to use phrases such as “I guess” and “I didn’t”.  This reiterates the hesitation.   The subject has now said that they never thought that computers could be used in the education setting.  It wasn’t that she didn’t know that computers could be used, but never considered them for anything other than typing.  In relation to the math program that the subject had used, she admitted that she didn’t trust computers.  She was perfectly content with solving equations on her own and using a computer wasn’t the only way to figure out how to solve the problem at hand.   
At this point of the transcript was when the researcher wanted the subject to begin to recall personal memories in regards to the computer.  This was when the subject admitted she didn’t consider that computers could relate to education.  She didn’t think that it was necessary.  This was when the dynamics of the language between the researcher and the subject began to change.  The questions and the responses went back and forth a lot more and the subject became more comfortable with the researcher.  While the responses were longer they still seemed to be informal and were quite choppy.  An example of this is as follows:  It was different, and ah, it was a fun experience because the teacher was very good, very willing to work with us,…we learned about the history of computers, and then it was the actual hands on. The subject relayed to the researcher that the math program wasn’t essential to her because it was on the computer and she saw it as difficult. 
Excerpt two continued with the researcher giving positive reinforcement to the subject by saying what she had previously said was interesting and taking a genuine interest in what the subject has to say.  The conversation began to change.  As the subject became more comfortable with the researcher the answers that she gave became longer.  The subject now became more expressive and in detail with memories and personal accounts.  There was less hesitation but the subject was still clinging to her fears of computers.  She began to talk about her fears when she was typing.  What really freaked her put was if she typed something and then it disappeared.  She didn’t know what to do and then discovered the undo button.  These little things that she started to discover allowed her to become less fearful.  The researcher realized that the subject had now found a new sense of assurance.  This is when you could tell that the fear that the subject had was diminishing.  She began to recall the things that she learned in word.  These were things that she taught herself.  She realized that if she needed help all she had to do was ask for it.  The end of the transcript yielded results that I didn’t expect.  The subject began to realize that her fear was irrational.  What I found to be interesting was when the subject first talked about buying a computer.  This event was really what changed her view point on technology. It was something that her children used more than her but none the less kept her curious.  When she took a course at Middlesex County College that’s when her fears really started to subside.  When the subject gave her response she was very explanatory.  The language that she used was similar to that of what she had used throughout the transcript. She gave one long sentence with several breaks.  The sentences were still choppy and very indirect.  This course that she took was an internet course.  It was all computer based so she was forced to become comfortable. The internet course helped me to build up my confidence, because we had to do everything on the computer. She realized that computers had been around for awhile and with the creation of the internet any questions that one had about anything really could be looked up with a click of a button. 
            The language use between the researcher and the subject went back and forth a lot.  The researcher was the one that was in the most control in the beginning and in middle of the transcript.  The subject seemed unsure and had several hesitations.  As the interview progressed the subject was able to open up.  I think that this was because the subject became more comfortable with the researcher.  It can also be in part because the subject may have realized that her fear of the computers was something that wasn’t as scary as it needed to be.  There was a lot that she taught herself partly because she needed to and didn’t even realize it. 
            Another lens that comes in to play is micro perspective. The transcript was done in the style of an interview so there was known face to face interaction.  The interaction between the researcher and the subject grew and developed throughout the course of the interview. 
            In reading through the Discourse Analysis in Classrooms book I found that the essay from chapter three that related the most to the adult learner’s transcript was An Interactional Sociolinguistic Perspective on an Instructional Conversation: Talking Opportunities for literacy into being by Mandy Smith.  The entire transcript was based on the interaction between the researcher and the subject building throughout the transcript.  In her essay Smith defines three principals.  There were two out of the three that I found could be applied to the adult learners’ transcript.  The first principal was that based around reactions between two or more people.  She stated that how people act and react to each other tells how their specific interactions construct what they are doing, what it means, and who they are.  From the beginning you could tell that the researcher was the one who held the power.  The researcher was the one who asked the questions and the subject answered them almost painfully in the beginning.  It took awhile for the connection to form between the two.  With time throughout the transcript I could see that the language use had changed and the comfort level became a lot higher.  This is due to two contributing factors; the changing relationship between the researcher and the subject, and the subject material of the interview becoming easier. The responses went from pure hesitation and uncertainty to more complex and concrete responses.  The subject was able to address her fear of computers and come across the notion that computers could be used for literacy purposes and that her fear was somewhat irrational.  I think that she came to his realization in part due to the questions that the researcher asked.  This provoked her to think and to search her mind.
            The second principal from Smiths essay that I applied to the adult learners’ transcript was the idea that relationships are formed through connections that are made.  The relationship between the researcher and the subject changed throughout the transcript.  The researcher was the one who was most dominant and the subject was more passive.  As the questions became more in depth the researcher was able to ease the subject into addressing her fears of the computer.  They are able to relate to each other and make connections at certain points that form the grounds of familiarity.  When the subject begins to feel comfortable with the researcher is when she really opens up.  The researcher even says at some points that some of the things she said are interesting and provides numerous points of positive reinforcement which allows the subject to open up even more.
This transcript was an excellent example of discourse analysis.  The linguistics were powerful throughout the transcript and it was interesting to see the relationship between the researcher and the subject gradually build up.  In the beginning there was numerous hesitation and uncertainty and by the middle of the transcript it was pretty much gone.  The transcript was based on the communication between the researcher and the subject and as the comfort level of the subject rose, the researcher was able to get more solid responses to questions which yielded a better more concise interview.   Through my analysis of the adult learners’ transcript I was able to make a discovery.  I discovered that   the choices that one makes with words had a powerful impact on the person that one is carrying a conversation with.  Communication and the relationship that was formed between the two parties are two examples of what is part of discourse analysis and both of those items had a huge impact on the transcript. 


Thursday, March 29, 2012

Rough Draft- Discourse Analysis- Adult Learners Transcript...


Discourse analysis by definition relates to language as a whole.  Discourse is the overall performance of language.   It relates to communication of thought by words, talk and conversation.  Its communication connected to culture and identity.  Discourse analysis is also the way that language is used to create meaning.  When language is broken into parts patterns can then be identified.  After this occurs relationships between the parts can also begin to be examined.  Discourse is something that one doesn’t realize occurs around them constantly.  The simple act of talking to family, friends, and even going to class involves conversation.  In the adult learners transcript the dynamics of the language used changed immensely over the course of the transcript.  The main focus of my paper will relate to the subjects feelings toward technology specifically computers and how it was never considered that they could be used for education purposes.  The researcher in this transcript is able to change the entire conversation by having the subject become more comfortable with researcher.

            The lens that I found to be most evident was language.  The word choices between the researcher and the subject were crucial.  The researcher started with a straight forward question and I could tell that the subject was not quite comfortable.  The subject responds to the question with a lot of hesitation.  The level of uncertainty was evident from this point and there seemed to be a slight awkwardness.  The subject has now said that they never thought that computers could be used in the education setting.  It wasn’t that she didn’t know that computers could be used but never considered them for anything other than typing.  In relation to the math program that the subject had used, she admitted that she didn’t trust computers.  She was perfectly content with solving equations on her own and using a computer wasn’t necessary.  She couldn’t wrap her mind around the fact that the computer could analyze and represent what she wanted it to represent. 

            At this point of the transcript was when the researcher wanted the subject to begin to recall personal memories in regards to the computer.  This was when the subject admitted that she didn’t consider that computers could relate to education.  She didn’t think that it was necessary.  This was when the dynamics of the language between the researcher and the subject began to change.  The questions and the responses went back and forth a lot more and the subject became more comfortable with the researcher.  The subject relayed to the researcher that the math program wasn’t essential to her because it was on the computer and she saw it as difficult.  The end of excerpt one concluded with the researcher confirming and reinforcing all of the subjects’ feelings towards computers.

            Excerpt two began with the researcher giving positive reinforcement to the subject by saying what she had previously said was interesting and taking a genuine interest in what the subject has to say.  The conversation began to change.  As the subject became more comfortable with the researcher the answers that she gave became longer.  The subject now became more expressive and in detail with memories and personal accounts.  There was less hesitation but the subject was still clinging to her fears of computers.  She began to talk about her fears when she was typing.  What really freaked her put was if she typed something and then it disappeared.  She didn’t know what to do and then discovered the undo button.  These little things that she started to discover allowed her to become less fearful.  The researcher realized that the subject had now found a new sense of assurance.  This is when you could tell that the fear that the subject had was diminishing.  She began to recall the things that she learned in word.  These were things that she taught herself.  She realized that if she needed help all she had to do was ask for it.  The end of the transcript yielded results that I didn’t expect.  The subject began to realize that her fear was irrational.  Computers had been around for awhile and with the creation of the Internet any questions that one had about anything really could be looked up with a click of a button. 

            The language use between the researcher and the subject went back and forth a lot.  The researcher was the one that was in the most control in the beginning and in middle of the transcript.  The subject seemed unsure and had several hesitations.  As the interview progressed the subject was able to open up.  I think that this was because the subject became more comfortable with the researcher.  It can also be in part because the subject may have realized that her fear of the computers was something that wasn’t as scary as it needed to be.  There was a lot that she taught herself partly because she needed to and didn’t even realize it. 

            Another lens that comes in to play is micro perspective. The transcript was done in the style of an interview so there was known face to face interaction.  The interaction between the researcher and the subject grew and developed throughout the course of the interview. 

            In reading through the Discourse Analysis in Classrooms book I found that the essay from chapter three that related the most to the adult learner’s transcript was An Interactional Sociolinguistic Perspective on an Instructional Conversation: Talking Opportunities for literacy into being by Mandy Smith.  The entire transcript was based on the interaction between the researcher and the subject building throughout the transcript.  In her essay Smith defines three principals.  There were two out of the three that I found could be applied to the adult learners’ transcript.  The first principal was that based around reactions between two or more people.  She stated that how people act and react to each other tells how their specific interactions construct what they are doing, what it means, and who they are.  From the beginning you could tell that the researcher was the one who held the power.  The researcher was the one who asked the questions and the subject answered them almost painfully in the beginning.  It took awhile for the connection to form between the two.  With time throughout the transcript I could see that the language use had changed and the comfort level became a lot higher.  The responses went from pure hesitation and uncertainty to more complex and concrete responses.  The subject was able to address her fear of computers and come across the notion that computers could be used for literacy purposes and that her fear was somewhat irrational.  I think that she came to his realization in part due to the questions that the researcher asked.  This provoked her to think and to search her mind.

            The second principal from Smiths essay that I applied to the adult learners’ transcript was the idea that relationships are formed through connections that are made.  The relationship between the researcher and the subject changed throughout the transcript.  The researcher was the one who was most dominant and the subject was more passive.  As the questions became more in depth the researcher was able to ease the subject into addressing her fears of the computer.  They are able to relate to each other and make connections at certain points that form the grounds of familiarity.  When the subject begins to feel comfortable with the researcher is when she really opens up.  The researcher even says at some points that some of the things she said are interesting and provides numerous points of positive reinforcement which allows the subject to open up even more.

            Overall I found the transcript to be quite interesting.  Now knowing what discourse analysis was helpful in examining the piece.  Paying attention to the linguistics was powerful because I now could piece together what was going on in terms of the interaction between the researcher and the subject.  The interaction and the relationship between the two gradually built itself up.  The language was essential to pay attention to.  The fact that in the beginning there was so much hesitation was a complete turnaround from what happened in the end.  The connections were made throughout the transcript and these connections kept building up on each other which allowed a relationship to form!




Friday, March 16, 2012

Discourse Analysis Project....

The transcript that I picked was sample transcript was the transcript number one about adult learners.  A possible research question that I would address is how does advanced technology affect adults learning process who have may not been exposed to new technology.

My analysis will show how opportunities for higher learning to take place.  The lens that I choose to apply to the transcript is language.  There a lot of points that I noticed where language had an influence on the transcript.  To start the interview off it was very casual. Ch who was the interviewer asked opinion based questions that M who was the subject could answer easily.  The answer that M gave were feelings about this or that and recalling memories.  What I thought was interesting was when they began discussing the use of the computer.  M began to describe her fears in relation to the computer.  She didn't think she could ever use the computer for math.  She didn't trust the technology and didn't believe that it could analyze the information the way  that she could.  Why use the computer program to do math if she could do it on her own just fine.  M also continued to say she didn't relate the computer to education, and that she didn't think that it was necesary.  As the transcript progressed the dynamics of the language changed immensely.  M now became the one who was developing longer answers as opposed to before when she just gave short phrases.  Her answers were more in detail and I think it was because she has become more comfortable.  When M begins to talk about how her life changed when she first bought a computer is when the emotion of the piece really came in.  She was able to discuss how she got exposed to useage of the computer and how slowly she became more advanced and more comfortable with it.  The conclusion of the article was based on M's realization that now if she did have questions about computers she would ask someone or she would read about it.  She has now realized that her fear of computers doesnt have to occur anymore because she knows a lot more then she thought and she now knows how computers can be applied to education.

The transcript realtes to Mandy Smith's research essay because the interviewer asked the subject to recall personal accounts and memories which promotes new opportunites for both parties to learn.

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Revised Research Question.....

The focus of my research paper is as follows:

What value is placed on literacy education in the home setting?

I am going to base my research using interviews and oral history.  I will be interviewing parents of the children that I babysit for and see what value they place on education in the home setting .  For the interview portion I have formulated some questions that I would like to ask them in order to get more information and relate it to my central focus.

Questions I would like to ask: 

#1-  How was education percieved for them when they were growing up?
        - I want to know what a typical day for them was when they came home from school.  Did they start their homework right away?  What would they do if they had trouble with something?  Who would they go to for help?

#2-  Did their parents show interest in their education? Were they encouraged?
        - I want to know what role and what influence their parents had on how they percived and learned literacy.

#3-  What practices have they used in regards to literacy and homework with their own children?
        - Based on the experiences they had growing up, do they use the same practices or are they different?

#4-   Is their anything that they would do different from how they were brought up in regards to learning literacy?  Or would they teach their children the same way?
       -  What is worth keeping to teach your children? What is worth changing?